SOVEREIGNTY
I. Introduction: Defining the Supreme PowerSovereignty is the defining attribute of a state, representing its supreme, final, and independent legal authority. The term is derived from the Latin word superanus , meaning "highest authority." It is the core concept that distinguishes a politically organized community (a state) from all other human associations, such as clubs, churches, or corporations.
Core Definitions
Political thinkers throughout history have struggled to capture its essence, resulting in classic definitions:
- Jean Bodin (16th Century): The first to systematically define sovereignty, calling it "the supreme power of the state over citizens and subjects unrestrained by the laws ." His definition focused on absolute internal power.
- Hugo Grotius (17th Century): "Sovereignty is the supreme political power vested in him whose acts are not subject to another and whose will cannot be overridden." Grotius extended the concept to include external independence, crucial for international law.
- Jellinek (20th Century): Defined it as the state's characteristic "in virtue of which it cannot be legally bound except by its own will, or limited by any other power than itself." This highlights the self-limiting nature of sovereign power.
In essence, sovereignty establishes two crucial facts for the state:
- Internal Supremacy: Its will is final and mandatory for all within its borders.
- External Independence: It is free from the control of any foreign state.
Sovereignty is traditionally analyzed through its internal and external dimensions, which together constitute the full capacity of a modern state.
- Internal Sovereignty
This aspect signifies the state's exclusive and ultimate legal authority over every individual, group, or association within its territory.
- Detail: Every person and institution—whether religious, political, economic, or social—must obey the laws and commands issued by the sovereign power. No local authority, powerful corporation, or religious body (e.g., a city council, a major trade union, or the Vatican within a state's territory) can claim exemption or supremacy over the state.
- Example: In India , the central government's law (passed by Parliament) on income tax is binding on every citizen and company, overriding the rules of any state government, city municipality, or business organization. This confirms the Parliament's position as the final law-making body within the nation.
- External Sovereignty
This aspect denotes the state's complete independence from the control or jurisdiction of any other foreign state or international body.
- Detail: The state has the absolute right to determine its foreign policy, enter into treaties, declare war, and manage trade without external coercion. While states often enter into international agreements (like the UN Charter or trade treaties), these are considered self-imposed obligations , not legal limitations on sovereignty, because the state can choose to withdraw from them.
- Example: When the United Kingdom decided to leave the European Union ( Brexit ), it was an exercise of its external sovereignty. Despite treaties and agreements with the EU, the UK asserted its supreme right to exit the arrangement and reclaim full autonomy over its borders, trade, and laws.
III. Indispensable Characteristics of Sovereignty
The supreme nature of sovereignty is underscored by a set of characteristics that are logically and legally essential to its existence.
| Characteristic | Explanation | Concrete Example |
|---|---|---|
| Absoluteness | Legally, there is no higher authority. The sovereign's will is final. Any practical limits (like morality, public opinion, or the constitution) are seen as self-imposed political restraints, not legal limits. | A country's Parliament, like the US Congress, can legally enact any law (within constitutional bounds) because no other domestic body can veto its supreme legal command. |
| Permanence | Sovereignty is attached to the state itself, not to the individual who wields power (the ruler or government). It lasts as long as the state lasts. | After a President's term ends or a Prime Minister resigns, the sovereign power immediately transfers to the new officeholder. It is never suspended or held in abeyance. |
| Universality | The law and authority of the sovereign extend to all persons and things within the state's territory. | In France, all residents, including foreign tourists and diplomats (though the latter receive courtesy immunities), are bound by French law. |
| Inalienability | Sovereignty cannot be transferred or surrendered. If a state alienates its sovereignty, it essentially commits self-destruction as a state. | A state cannot sell its sovereignty to another country. If a part of its territory is ceded, the sovereignty is lost over that territory, but the state itself remains sovereign. |
| Exclusiveness | There can be only one sovereign in a state. Two supreme wills over the same people would lead to confusion, conflict, and the breakdown of order (imperium in imperio). | The US Constitution clearly establishes the federal government as the single supreme authority, even while dividing powers; the supremacy clause clarifies that federal law is supreme over state law. |
| Indivisibility | Sovereignty is a unit. It cannot be divided into two or more parts. What is often mistaken for division (especially in federations) is actually the division of governmental powers, not the supreme legal authority itself. | In Canada, powers are divided between the federal and provincial governments, but the ultimate, undivided sovereignty of the Canadian state rests in the combination of authorities that can amend the constitution. |
Export to Sheets
IV. Classification of Sovereignty (Types)Political thought has evolved several distinctions to locate the true seat of power in diverse political systems.
- Legal vs. Political Sovereignty
This distinction is crucial in understanding the practical reality of democratic governance.
| Aspect | Legal Sovereignty | Political Sovereignty |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Determinate (identifiable, organized, legally recognized). | Indeterminate (unorganized, abstract, a sum of influences). |
| Location | The person or body with the supreme law-making power. | The body of forces, interests, and influences that shape and control the legal sovereign. |
| Examples | The King-in-Parliament in the UK; the amending bodies (President + Parliament) in India. | The Electorate (voters), Public Opinion (media, social movements), and Pressure Groups. |
| Relationship | The legal sovereign is the agent that gives the political sovereign's will legal form. The legal sovereign must "bow" to the political sovereign's will to remain in power. |
Example: In the UK , Parliament is the supreme legal sovereign, able to make or unmake any law. However, if Parliament ignores the wishes of the Electorate (the political sovereign) on a major issue, it risks being voted out in the next election, forcing it to act according to the popular will.
- De Jure vs. De Facto Sovereignty
This distinction arises during times of political instability, revolution, or civil war, differentiating between power based on right and power based on force.
| Aspect | De Jure Sovereignty (By Law) | De Facto Sovereignty (In Fact) |
|---|---|---|
| Basis | Legal right and constitutional legitimacy. | Physical force and actual power to compel obedience. |
| Location | The authority legally designated by the constitution. | The individual or group that holds power by the sword or popular acceptance. |
| Example | During the English Civil War, Charles I was the de jure sovereign. After his execution, Oliver Cromwell and the Parliament became the de facto sovereign by controlling the military. | In 1949, the Republic of China government, which fled to Taiwan, remained the de jure sovereign for many countries, while the Communist Party of China under Mao Zedong became the de facto sovereign on the mainland. |
| Transition | A de facto sovereign often seeks to become de jure by establishing a new constitution or gaining popular/international recognition. |
Export to Sheets
- Nominal (Titular) vs. Real Sovereignty
This applies mainly to parliamentary democracies with a ceremonial head of state.
| Aspect | Nominal/Titular Sovereignty | Real Sovereignty |
|---|---|---|
| Role | Ceremonial; the head of state in whose name all actions are taken. | Functional; the governing body that exercises actual executive and legislative control. |
| Example | The President of India or the Monarch of Spain (signs laws, but does not formulate them). | The Council of Ministers led by the Prime Minister (formulates policy and directs the government). |
- Popular Sovereignty
This is a modern doctrine asserting that the final authority rests with the people in their collective capacity. It emerged from the Social Contract theories of thinkers like Rousseau and became the foundational principle of the American and French Revolutions.
- Detail: It means the government's legitimacy flows from the consent of the governed. It's the basis for universal suffrage and democracy.
- Example: The opening words of the U.S. Constitution, "We the People," are the definitive statement of popular sovereignty, meaning the authority of the law comes from the citizenry.
Sovereignty remains the cornerstone of the state system, affirming the state's essential nature as a politically organized community independent of external control. While the legal concept insists on its absolute and indivisible nature, the modern world has complicated its application:
- Rise of Constitutionalism: A sovereign state is often a limited government where the exercise of power is constrained by a constitution (e.g., fundamental rights, judicial review). This is a self-limitation , but a crucial one.
- Globalisation and Interdependence: International organizations (like the WTO or the UN Security Council) and global threats (climate change, pandemics) necessitate cooperation, leading states to voluntarily pool or limit some powers. This is seen by most as contractual obligation , not a true loss of legal sovereignty.
- The Democratic Mandate: The enduring tension between the Legal Sovereign and the Political Sovereign in a democracy ensures that power, while legally absolute, is politically accountable. The will of the people acts as an eternal, moral, and popular check on arbitrary rule.
In final analysis, the supreme power of the state (sovereignty) is a legal fiction of absolute authority that makes law and order possible, even as its practical use is perpetually moderated by internal political forces and external geopolitical realities.
Copyright © 2025 Manupatra. All Rights Reserved.













