Manupatra Academy

Explore. Learn. Upskill. All Things Law

Courses, Cases, Research, and Resources in One Place

New

Internships

Opportunities : Playbook : Videos

Learn More

Law Notes (1^st - 5^th Year)

Structured notes with flashcards to help law students grasp core subjects quickly.

Know More

Manupatra Certified Legal Research Program

Module-based learning : Legal research skills : Certification test

Learn More

Courses

Structured learning : Practice-oriented modules : Different stages of legal practice

Learn More

News and Recent Judgment Gist

News
Gist

1. Supreme Court directs Andhra Pradesh State Election Commission to halt polls in 100 urban local bodies

Supreme Court directs Andhra Pradesh State Election Commission to halt polls in 100 urban local bodies

The Andhra Pradesh State Election Commission has halted elections to 100 urban local bodies following directions from the Supreme Court, Press Trust of India reported. State Election Commissioner Anil Chandra Punetha on Wednesday ordered an immediate stop to further election proceedings in 13 municipal corporations and 87 municipalities and nagar panchayats. The commission had issued the election notification on October 14, with nominations filed from October 16 to 18 and scrutiny of papers on October 19. In an official release, Punetha said that in view of the Supreme Court's directions, the further election process in respect of all 100 urban local bodies in the state shall be stopped forthwith. The decision followed a special leave petition filed by the YSR Congress Party in the Supreme Court against an Andhra Pradesh High Court order refusing to extend the nomination deadline, which ended on October 19. The Supreme Court directed the commission to postpone the publication of the final list of candidates until October 25 and asked Punetha to consider representations made by the YSRCP and several candidates. The court also directed the commission to examine documents and electronic evidence submitted to it before deciding whether to extend the nomination deadline in urban local bodies where candidates may have been unable to file their papers because of the law-and-order situation. Punetha said the commission would issue an order on October 22 on extending the nomination deadline after obtaining reports from district administrations; if extended, candidates would be given at least 48 hours from publication of the decision and the election notification would be amended accordingly. The YSRCP filed the petition through advocate-on-record Mahfooz A Nazki and informed the Supreme Court about alleged violence during the nomination process in Punganur, Rayachoti, Kadapa and Tirupati, alleging that its candidates were attacked, threatened and prevented from reaching nomination centres. The party asked the court to direct the authorities to provide adequate police protection and ensure candidates could file nominations without fear. The election process in all 100 urban local bodies will remain halted while the commission considers the representations and evidence, obtains district administration reports and decides whether to extend the nomination deadline.

2. Karnataka government to outsource regulatory inspections and certification in three departments

Karnataka government to outsource regulatory inspections and certification in three departments

Owing to a staff shortage, the Karnataka government has decided to outsource regulatory functions such as inspections, verification and certifications in three departments to private firms. The departments are Factories, Boilers, Industrial Safety and Health in the Labour Department; Food Safety and Drug Administration in the Health and Family Welfare Department; and Legal Metrology in the Food and Civil Supplies Department. The decision follows concerns that the Food Safety and Drug Administration department has been overwhelmed by the number of establishments it must inspect. Health and Family Welfare Minister U. T. Khader had proposed deploying citizens and retired officials from the department at the taluk level to act as force multipliers. The direction is in line with recommendations of the Karnataka Administrative Reforms Commission-2, which stated that wherever sufficient inspectors or staff are not available to ensure regulatory compliance, departments shall rely on the services of reputed, empanelled third-party agencies, according to a letter by Harsh Gupta, Principal Secretary to Government, Praja Seva Department, sent to the three departments. Gupta said the relevant Central Acts and Regulations already recognise third-party testing, audit, or inspection in some of these areas and that these may be adopted to the extent permissible, and he asked officials to examine the relevant State Rules, notifications and procedures and take up the modifications needed to implement this. Statutory powers of inspection, sampling, seizure and prosecution will remain with officials of the departments, who can then concentrate on risk-based and targeted inspections guided by third-party audit findings. Where no periodic inspection is prescribed, periodic third-party verification may be prescribed as a best practice, which the letter said would ensure a minimum level of regulatory compliance even where departmental inspectors are unable to visit establishments regularly. The three departments have been told to prepare an action plan for the Praja Seva Department with a timeline for implementation. They have been asked to identify inspections, verifications and certifications that can be entrusted to or supported by third-party agencies and to frame eligibility criteria, accreditation requirements, fee structure and terms for empanelment of reputed third-party agencies, and to take up empanelment. They have also been told to put in place a supervisory mechanism for departmental oversight, including random test-checks of the agencies' work and action against agencies for lapses. The report was published on October 22, 2026, at 12:20 pm IST.

3. Karnataka High Court rules no right to archived court proceeding recordings without judicial order

Karnataka High Court rules no right to archived court proceeding recordings without judicial order

The Karnataka High Court has held that litigants do not have a right to seek copies of archived audio-visual recordings of court proceedings unless a specific judicial direction is made. Justice CM Poonacha, examining Rules 8 and 10 of the Karnataka Rules on Live Streaming and Recording of Court Proceedings, 2021, observed that a combined reading of the provisions does not confer any right on a petitioner to seek copies of such recordings unless specifically ordered by the Court. The ruling came while dismissing a petition filed by 72-year-old A Sathyanarayana Swamy, who challenged the High Court administration's rejection of his application seeking copies of archived recordings of proceedings in an appeal. Swamy had applied under Rule 8(3) of the 2021 Rules, but the administration rejected the application relying on Rule 10(1)(ii), stating that archived data does not automatically become part of the official record of court proceedings unless the bench expressly directs otherwise. Swamy sought to quash the communication and obtain access to the recordings, contending that Rule 8(3) specifically allows applications for copies of recordings not uploaded to the Court's website or other digital platforms. He also challenged the rejection as violative of Article 14 of the Constitution and requested directions to frame and publish clear guidelines or standard operating procedures for exercising powers under Rule 8(3). The Court examined Rule 10(1)(ii), which provides that archival data shall not constitute the official record of court proceedings unless otherwise directed by the Bench, and concluded that the provisions did not confer an enforceable right on the petitioner absent a specific order by the bench. The Court ruled that in the absence of any right vested with the petitioner, the question of assailing the rejection of his request for copies did not arise. Advocate Girish Hegde represented the petitioner.

4. Madhya Pradesh High Court rules daughter's compassionate appointment claim not automatically superior to grandson's

Madhya Pradesh High Court rules daughter's compassionate appointment claim not automatically superior to grandson's

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the claim of a deceased government employee's daughter for compassionate appointment cannot automatically be treated as superior to a grandson's claim. The bench of Justice Anand Singh Bahrawat emphasized that compassionate appointment is required to be examined in accordance with the applicable State policy and the facts placed before the competent authority. The petitioner was the grandson of a government employee who worked as a Dai in a government Ayurvedic Dispensary in District Bhind. The petitioner's father died in 2008 when he was only 12 years old, after which the petitioner, his widowed mother, two sisters, and a younger brother were dependent on his grandmother. The petitioner claimed his grandmother died in December 2015, and as a dependent family member he filed an application for compassionate appointment in June 2016, stating he had the required educational qualifications. The screening committee considered his application and he was appointed to the post of Dawasaj through an order dated August 29, 2016, on probation for three years. A false complaint was later filed alleging that he did not fall within the definition of dependent under Clauses 2.1 to 2.7 of the policy of September 2014, and a show cause notice was issued to him. Despite his reply and statement, the Divisional Ayush Officer, respondent no. 3, passed the impugned order in February 2019 cancelling his appointment. The petitioner's counsel argued that the appointment was cancelled without providing an opportunity of hearing and that cancelling the appointment of a 4th class employee is a major penalty under the Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966. The counsel also argued that under Clauses 2.5 and 2.7 of the policy, any adopted son or nominated member is eligible for appointment where both the husband and wife are deceased, and that the petitioner was nominated by his grandmother in her service records, making his appointment lawful and without misrepresentation. The respondent's counsel argued that the impugned order was rightly passed since the petitioner does not fall within the definition of eligible dependents under Clauses 2.1 to 2.7 of the policy, and that the objective of the policy is to provide a source of livelihood to dependents of the deceased government employee, so the petitioner, being the son of the widowed daughter, is not an eligible dependent. The court noted that the issue for consideration was whether the respondents were justified in cancelling the petitioner's appointment after he had been appointed upon consideration of his case by the competent authority. [2026 (MP) 421]

5. Article proposes hybrid appellate model for domestic arbitration amid integrity and jurisprudence concerns

Article proposes hybrid appellate model for domestic arbitration amid integrity and jurisprudence concerns

Domestic arbitration in India is at a crossroads, according to the article. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was enacted to provide a modern, efficient and commercially responsive dispute resolution framework, but recent developments suggest public confidence in the regime faces serious challenges. Governmental bodies are reducing reliance on arbitration and arbitration jurisprudence remains uncertain. The article says these developments do not establish that arbitration has failed, but warrant examining whether the framework delivers certainty, efficiency and integrity. It argues the response should not be retreat, because arbitration retains advantages over litigation such as specialised adjudication, procedural flexibility and cost and time efficiency. The article proposes a hybrid appellate model founded on party autonomy: parties would choose at the outset between the existing limited-intervention framework and an alternative route providing a single appeal on procedure and merits, consolidating existing post-award challenge and appeal mechanisms rather than adding another layer of proceedings. On integrity concerns, the article notes that in June 2024 the Ministry of Finance issued an Office Memorandum describing arbitration as time-consuming and a drain on the exchequer’s money and restricting arbitration to disputes under INR 10 crore. The Public Works Department of the Government of NCT of Delhi issued a circular dated 21 April 2025 mandating deletion of arbitration clauses from the General Clauses of Contract, effectively making litigation the preferred mode of dispute resolution. The article describes the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways circular dated 12 January 2026 as the most significant development. Applying to BOT (Toll), HAM and EPC contracts for national highway projects and NHAI standard procurement contracts, it mandates administrative settlement as the primary mechanism and disfavours arbitration where the aggregate claim exceeds INR 10 crore. It applies to contracts executed after 12 January 2026, and existing contracts are to be amended by supplementary agreements. MoRTH is described as one of the largest participants in India’s infrastructure ecosystem and the strongest indicator of the trend. The article states that no single circular proves arbitration is failing and that the MoRTH direction is merely administrative, but when multiple government stakeholders across sectors independently move away from arbitration, signalling concerns about the arbitral process and arbitrators, the pattern is difficult to dismiss. On inconsistent arbitration jurisprudence, the article cites the GHAC Arbitration Week 2026, held from 4 to 6 September 2026 at the GIFT City Club in Gandhinagar, where Justice R.F. Nariman in his keynote address identified inconsistency in Indian arbitration jurisprudence as a significant concern. He observed that several Supreme Court decisions arose because uncertain questions of law required reconsideration by larger Benches, a pattern particularly problematic for a system meant to be efficient and predictable; if legal principles repeatedly change, parties face uncertainty about both the conduct and outcome of proceedings. The most striking illustration given is whether an unstamped instrument containing an arbitration agreement can be enforced. SMS Tea Estates v. Chandmari Tea Co. held that it cannot be acted upon, followed by Garware Wall Ropes v. Coastal Marine Constructions & Engg. Ltd. A three-judge bench in N.N. Global Mercantile v. Indo Unique Flame overruled SMS Tea Estates, holding the arbitration agreement independent through separability. A five-judge bench in N.N. Global Mercantile reversed course, holding that an unstamped instrument does not exist in law.

1. Nagendra Ray vs. State of Bihar and Ors. (16.10.2026 - SC)(MANU/SC/1196/2026)

The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeals by Nagendra Ray challenging the Patna High Court's orders granting bail to Kamakhya Singh, Ram Pratap Singh, and Ramakant Solanki, accused in a murder

2. Mahesh Chandra Joshi vs. State of Rajasthan (16.10.2026 - SC)(MANU/SC/1195/2026)

The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeals of Mahesh Chandra Joshi and Mukesh Pathak against the Rajasthan High Court's denial of bail in a case involving alleged tender irregularities under the

3. Satinder Pal Singh and Ors. vs. Bedi Hospital and Ors. (16.10.2026 - SC)(MANU/SC/1194/2026)

The Supreme Court of India addressed the dispute between Satinder Pal Singh and others versus Bedi Hospital and others, concerning the cancellation of a bid contract for a nursing home site by the Cha

4. Just Rights For Children Alliance and Ors. vs. S. Harish and Ors. (15.10.2026 - SC)(MANU/SC/1192/2026)

The Supreme Court of India addressed the issue of the circulation of Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse Material (CSEAM) on social media platforms, involving Just Rights For Children Alliance and oth

5. Tejaram vs. State of Rajasthan (16.10.2026 - SC)(MANU/SC/1191/2026)

The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeal by Tejaram against the State of Rajasthan, challenging the framing of charges under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, without prior a

View More Gist.. View More News..

Law Students Hub

Notes : Flashcards : Landmark Cases & more…

Learn More

New

Legal Glossary

Complex terms decoded : Easy explanations

Learn More

On-demand Courses

Recorded classes : Comprehensive reading material :Quiz

Learn More

Self-Paced Certification

Courses to upskill or reskill

Learn More

Webinars

Recordings of experts views :Diverse topics

Learn More

Law Teachers Hub

Readings : Resources for legal educators

Learn More

Legal Posts

Explainers : Blogs : Articles : Case Analysis

Learn More

Survey Reports

AI Adoption : Technology in law

Learn More

Illustrated Cases

Legal Design : Supreme Court Cases : Multilingual Exploration

Learn More

New

Case Infographics

Quickly understand key facts, court decisions, and legal principles through easy-to-follow infographics.

Know More

Our Partners

Why Join Manupatra Academy

Brought to you by Manupatra the leaders in legal tech domain.

Curated Resources: A vast repository of meticulously compiled resources tailored for educators and learners.
Diverse Courses: An array of courses designed to cater to various levels of expertise, from beginners to advanced.
User-Friendly Interface: Accessible on any device, our intuitive interface ensures seamless navigation.

What Our Learners Say

User-Friendly Interface: Accessible on any device, our intuitive interface ensures seamless navigation.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

It was extremely beneficial and practical… really helped me understand the nuances of civil drafting and boosted my confidence in preparing real pleadings.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

The sessions were so insightful and well-structured… the faculty explained every concept with patience and clarity, which made learning much easier.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

Honestly, it was a great learning experience… the course covered everything from plaints to petitions in such a smooth and engaging way.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

The workshop was very hands-on and practical… I really liked the live feedback and the real examples shared during drafting exercises.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

Very well conducted and informative… I just wish it could’ve been a bit longer because the sessions were that helpful.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

The session was honestly eye-opening! I never realized how much time I was wasting on formatting until now.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

Really practical and focused on what lawyers actually need… I can already see how it’ll save hours in my daily work.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

The trainer made even the technical tools so easy to understand… and I loved how they used real pleading examples.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

Very relevant for lawyers and interns alike… it bridges the tech gap we all face while working on documents.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

A concise and super useful masterclass… I now feel confident managing citations, templates, and formatting with ease.