Manupatra Academy

Explore. Learn. Upskill. All Things Law

Courses, Cases, Research, and Resources in One Place

New

Internships

Opportunities : Playbook : Videos

Learn More

1^st Year Law Notes

Structured notes with flashcards to help first-year students grasp core subjects quickly.

Know More

New

2^nd Year Law Notes

Structured notes with flashcards to help second-year students grasp core subjects quickly.

Know More

New

3^rd Year Law Notes

Structured notes with flashcards to help third-year students grasp core subjects quickly.

Know More

News and Recent Judgment Gist (BETA)

News
Gist

1. NCLAT Sets Aside INR 301.61 Cr CCI Penalty Against Grasim Industries; Remands for Fresh Hearing

NCLAT Sets Aside INR 301.61 Cr CCI Penalty Against Grasim Industries; Remands for Fresh Hearing - Litigation - 1 min read NCLAT Sets Aside INR 301.61 Cr CCI Penalty Against Grasim Industries; Remands

NCLAT Sets Aside INR 301.61 Cr CCI Penalty Against Grasim Industries; Remands for Fresh Hearing

NCLAT Sets Aside INR 301.61 Cr CCI Penalty Against Grasim Industries; Remands for Fresh Hearing - Litigation - 1 min read NCLAT Sets Aside INR 301.61 Cr CCI Penalty Against Grasim Industries; Remands for Fresh Hearing The case now returns to the CCI for reconsideration, potentially opening a fresh window for the company to challenge the competition law allegations in the VSF business segment. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) on 5 May 2026 set aside the Competition Commission of India's order dated 16 March 2020 imposing a penalty of INR 301.61 crore on Grasim Industries Limited in relation to its Viscose Staple Fibre (VSF) business and remanded the case to the CCI for a fresh hearing and consideration. “On 5th May 2026, the NCLAT has set aside the Order dated 16th March 2020, and remanded the matter back to the CCI for fresh hearing and consideration. Consequently, the penalty of INR 301.61 crore and certain behavioural directions imposed earlier on the Company have been set aside,” the company disclosed in an exchange filing. Grasim had filed an appeal before NCLAT and obtained a stay on the penalty, and had not created any provision in its books of account in relation to the matter. “The Company had not created any provision in the books of account on account of this matter,” the company noted. The case now returns to the CCI for reconsideration, potentially opening a fresh window for the company to challenge the competition law allegations in the VSF business segment. The company made this disclosure before the exchange under regulation 30 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“Listing Regulations”).

2. Supreme Court should take cognisance of West Bengal poll process: Akhilesh Yadav

Supreme Court should take cognisance of West Bengal poll process: Akhilesh Yadav Questioning the fairness of the West Bengal Assembly polls, Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav on Wednesday (May

3. No Community Targeted: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in “Behead” Instagram Post Case

No Community Targeted: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in “Behead” Instagram Post Case

No Community Targeted: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in “Behead” Instagram Post Case No Community Targeted: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in “Behead” Instagram Post Case The Allahabad High Court grants bail to accused in social media post case, citing absence of targeted hate and prior criminal record. The Allahabad High Court has granted bail to a man accused of posting on social media, “I love Mohammed and can both get beheaded for him and behead others,” observing that the content did not target any specific caste or community and that the accused had no prior criminal history. The order was passed by the bench of Justice Rajiv Lochan Shukla on a bail application filed by Nadeem in connection with case registered at Budhana police station in Muzaffar Nagar district last year. The case had been lodged under Sections 353(2) (corresponding to Section 505, IPC), 192 (corresponding to Section 153, IPC), and 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (a newly added Section). According to the prosecution, Nadeem had posted certain objectionable comments on his Instagram handle, which led to the registration of the FIR. The State opposed the grant of bail, arguing that the content was inflammatory in nature and had the potential to disturb public order. The Additional Government Advocate referred to another bail matter arising out of Bareilly district, claiming that similar slogans had previously triggered widespread riots and caused damage to property. It observed that the Bareilly case cited by the State involved a different individual and a separate set of circumstances.

4. Andhra HC Young Lawyer Custody Row: SCBA Expresses Shock, Seeks CJI Intervention

Andhra HC Young Lawyer Custody Row: SCBA Expresses Shock, Seeks CJI Intervention

Andhra HC Young Lawyer Custody Row: SCBA Expresses Shock, Seeks CJI Intervention Andhra HC Young Lawyer Custody Row: SCBA Expresses Shock, Seeks CJI Intervention SCBA urged CJI intervention after alleged custody direction against a young lawyer in Andhra Pradesh High Court sparked concern over judicial conduct The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) has expressed “deep concern and shock” over a reported incident dated May 5, 2026 in the Andhra Pradesh High Court, where a young advocate was allegedly directed to be taken into judicial custody for 24 hours during court proceedings. The incident occurred before Justice Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao and has since triggered widespread discussion within the legal fraternity after video clips of the proceedings surfaced on social media. According to the SCBA, the footage shows the advocate repeatedly expressing regret and seeking pardon before the Court. The Association noted that the episode has caused concern among members of the Bar across the country and has particularly unsettled young members of the legal profession. Reiterating foundational principles governing the justice system, the SCBA said the relationship between the Bench and the Bar rests on mutual respect, dignity, patience, and institutional balance. While emphasising that courts must maintain authority and decorum, it stressed that judicial power must also reflect restraint, proportionality, fairness, and compassion, especially when dealing with young lawyers still in the early stages of practice. The Bar body further observed that the rule of law demands both discipline in court proceedings and fairness in judicial conduct, stating that the strength of the judiciary is reflected in its patience and balanced approach. The SCBA cautioned that any action leading to fear, humiliation, or intimidation of young advocates could adversely impact the…

5. After Bengal, Tamil Nadu, Akhilesh Yadav Cuts I-PAC Ties For 2027 UP Poll

After Bengal, Tamil Nadu, Akhilesh Yadav Cuts I-PAC Ties For 2027 UP Poll The Samajwadi Party-I-PAC break-up follows the arrest of Vinesh Chandel, who co-founded the firm with Prashant Kishor and othe

1. Sujal Vishwas Attavar and Ors. vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. (04.05.2026 - SC)(MANU/SC/0433/2026)

The Supreme Court of India addressed whether the High Court could direct the registration of an FIR under Article 226 without exhausting alternative remedies. The parties involved were Sujal Vishwas A

2. Dr. Bais Surgical and Medical Institute Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. vs. Dhananjay Pande (04.05.2026 - SC)(MANU/SC/0432/2026)

The Supreme Court of India addressed whether Dhananjay Pande could be considered a "member" of Dr. Bais Surgical and Medical Institute Pvt. Ltd. without his name being formally entered in the register

3. The State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. vs. R. Sasipriya and Ors. (04.05.2026 - SC)(MANU/SC/0431/2026)

The Supreme Court of India addressed the dispute between the State of Tamil Nadu and R. Sasipriya regarding the validity of a government order promoting T. Gnanavel to Assistant Engineer, which was ch

4. Bonatrans India (Pvt.) Ltd. vs. Bonatrans Employees Union (29.04.2026 - SC)(MANU/SC/0430/2026)

The Supreme Court of India addressed the dispute between Bonatrans India Pvt. Ltd. and Bonatrans Employees Union regarding whether certain employees qualify as "workmen" under Section 2(s) of the Indu

5. S. Ettiappan vs. D. Kumar and Ors. (16.10.2025 - SC)(MANU/SC/1814/2025)

The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeal by S. Ettiappan seeking enhanced compensation for injuries sustained in a road accident involving a lorry driven negligently by D. Kumar and others. The

View More Gist.. View More News..

New

4^th Year Law Notes

Structured notes with flashcards to help fourth-year students grasp core subjects quickly.

Know More

Manupatra Certified Legal Research Program

Module-based learning : Legal research skills : Certification test

Learn More

Law Students Hub

Notes : Flashcards : Landmark Cases & more…

Learn More

New

Legal Glossary

Complex terms decoded : Easy explanations

Learn More

Courses

Structured learning : Practice-oriented modules : Different stages of legal practice

Learn More

On-demand Courses

Recorded classes : Comprehensive reading material :Quiz

Learn More

Self-Paced Certification

Courses to upskill or reskill

Learn More

Webinars

Recordings of experts views :Diverse topics

Learn More

Law Teachers Hub

Readings : Resources for legal educators

Learn More

Legal Posts

Explainers : Blogs : Articles : Case Analysis

Learn More

Survey Reports

AI Adoption : Technology in law

Learn More

Illustrated Cases

Legal Design : Supreme Court Cases : Multilingual Exploration

Learn More

Our Partners

Why Join Manupatra Academy

Brought to you by Manupatra the leaders in legal tech domain.

Curated Resources: A vast repository of meticulously compiled resources tailored for educators and learners.
Diverse Courses: An array of courses designed to cater to various levels of expertise, from beginners to advanced.
User-Friendly Interface: Accessible on any device, our intuitive interface ensures seamless navigation.

What Our Learners Say

User-Friendly Interface: Accessible on any device, our intuitive interface ensures seamless navigation.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

It was extremely beneficial and practical… really helped me understand the nuances of civil drafting and boosted my confidence in preparing real pleadings.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

The sessions were so insightful and well-structured… the faculty explained every concept with patience and clarity, which made learning much easier.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

Honestly, it was a great learning experience… the course covered everything from plaints to petitions in such a smooth and engaging way.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

The workshop was very hands-on and practical… I really liked the live feedback and the real examples shared during drafting exercises.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

Very well conducted and informative… I just wish it could’ve been a bit longer because the sessions were that helpful.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

The session was honestly eye-opening! I never realized how much time I was wasting on formatting until now.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

Really practical and focused on what lawyers actually need… I can already see how it’ll save hours in my daily work.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

The trainer made even the technical tools so easy to understand… and I loved how they used real pleading examples.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

Very relevant for lawyers and interns alike… it bridges the tech gap we all face while working on documents.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

A concise and super useful masterclass… I now feel confident managing citations, templates, and formatting with ease.