Explore. Learn. Upskill. All Things Law

Courses, Cases, Research, and Resources in One Place

News and Recent Judgment Gist

  • News
  • Gist

1. Madras High Court rules no court fee refund after out-of-court settlement once trial begins

The Madras High Court has held that litigants are not entitled to a refund of court fees when a civil dispute is settled out of court after the commencement of trial. Justice P.B. Balaji declined to f

Madras High Court rules no court fee refund after out-of-court settlement once trial begins

The Madras High Court has held that litigants are not entitled to a refund of court fees when a civil dispute is settled out of court after the commencement of trial. Justice P.B. Balaji declined to follow the Supreme Court's judgment in M.C. Subramaniam's case and instead followed the Supreme Court's 2010 judgment in Afcons Infrastructure Limited v. Cherian Varkey Construction Company Private Limited, holding that an earlier ratio of a coordinate Bench binds a later Bench of equal strength and that a later Bench must refer the matter to a larger Bench if it disagrees. The court examined Section 69 of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955, which originally provided for refund of 50% of court fees when a suit was dismissed as settled out of court before any evidence was recorded on the merits of the claim. Section 69A, introduced in 2007, provided for refund of 100% of court fees if a dispute was settled after the court referred it to arbitration, mediation, conciliation, Lok Adalat or other alternative dispute resolution mechanisms mentioned in Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The 2017 amendment provided for return of 100% court fees under Section 69 as well, but retained the words 'before any evidence has been recorded on the merits of the claim.' Justice Balaji held that, because the Supreme Court in Afcons Infrastructure held that civil courts could refer disputes to ADR only before commencement of trial, litigants would not be entitled to a refund of court fees after trial commences. The verdict was passed while dismissing two civil revision petitions. The first petition challenged a Tiruvallur district court order to refund only 50% of court fees; the second challenged a Chengalpattu court order that the litigant would not be entitled to refund of the entire ₹2.54 lakh paid towards court fees. Justice Balaji held that both petitioners would not be entitled to refund of any amount of court fees since the out-of-court settlement was reached only after commencement of trial. However, because the State had not filed a revision petition against the order to refund 50% of court fees to the first petitioner, the judge refrained from interfering with the Tiruvallur court's order. The judge also suggested that the 2007 version of Section 69A, which required a certificate authorising full refund if the dispute was settled, should be restored, as the 2017 amendment's immediate refund could go against the public exchequer if the dispute did not get settled through ADR.

2.

3. Delhi High Court gives NMC and DGHS two weeks to submit joint inquiry report on two doctors' qualifications

The Delhi High Court on October 30 directed the National Medical Commission and the Delhi government's Directorate General of Health Services to submit a joint inquiry report within two weeks on the m

Delhi High Court gives NMC and DGHS two weeks to submit joint inquiry report on two doctors' qualifications

The Delhi High Court on October 30 directed the National Medical Commission and the Delhi government's Directorate General of Health Services to submit a joint inquiry report within two weeks on the medical qualifications of two doctors accused of mishandling a child during treatment. The order was passed by Justice Neena Bansal Krishna while hearing a contempt petition filed by Sapna Jain on behalf of her minor son, Devarsh Jain, alleging that the authorities failed to comply with an earlier direction to submit the report. The petition claimed Devarsh suffered severe brain damage in 2017 after allegedly being mishandled by two unqualified doctors who misrepresented themselves as super-specialists at Fortis Hospital in Shalimar Bagh, and that he is in a permanent vegetative state with West syndrome, epilepsy and cerebral palsy. In March 2025, the High Court sought affidavits on whether the doctors' claimed qualifications entitled them to practise as specialists in India. In May 2026, the court directed the NMC Secretary and DGHS to conduct a joint inquiry and submit a report within eight weeks. The contempt petition alleged the report was not submitted by the July 24 deadline and no extension was sought. The court posted the matter for further hearing on December 16.

4. Allahabad High Court awards ₹1.25 lakh compensation for 5-day illegal police detention

The Allahabad High Court awarded ₹1.25 lakh in compensation to Chandan Rajbhar for five days of illegal police detention, at ₹25,000 per day, while allowing a habeas corpus petition filed by Gyanti De

Allahabad High Court awards ₹1.25 lakh compensation for 5-day illegal police detention

The Allahabad High Court awarded ₹1.25 lakh in compensation to Chandan Rajbhar for five days of illegal police detention, at ₹25,000 per day, while allowing a habeas corpus petition filed by Gyanti Devi and two others seeking his release. A Bench of Justice Atul Sreedharan and Justice Achal Sachdev found that Investigating Officer Deep Narayan Yadav detained Rajbhar from August 28 to September 2, 2026 without following procedure and showed his formal arrest on September 2, following an October 21 inquiry report by the Circle Officer that accepted five days of unlawful confinement and a fabricated arrest. The Superintendent of Police, Deoria, initiated departmental proceedings against the IO on October 21. The Court said compensation could be recovered from persons found guilty after inquiry and would not preclude a tort suit against the Police Department, directed Rajbhar's release forthwith if not required in another case, and observed that the harshest punishment be considered if the IO is found guilty in the departmental inquiry. The FIR was lodged on July 18, 2026 under Section 87 BNSS at Salempur Police Station, Deoria, after a complaint that Rajbhar had eloped with the complainant's 18-year-old daughter; the petitioners said the couple later married in Siwan, Bihar, and lived in Pune, where police took them into custody.

5. CBI secures extradition of Mahadev betting app promoter Sourabh Chandrakar from Oman

The CBI said on Sunday (November 1, 2026) that it had secured the extradition of Sourabh Chandrakar, a promoter of the illegal betting app Mahadev Online Book, from Oman. Chandrakar, from Chhattisgarh

CBI secures extradition of Mahadev betting app promoter Sourabh Chandrakar from Oman

The CBI said on Sunday (November 1, 2026) that it had secured the extradition of Sourabh Chandrakar, a promoter of the illegal betting app Mahadev Online Book, from Oman. Chandrakar, from Chhattisgarh’s Durg district, was traced to the Gulf country and detained by the Royal Oman Police after an Interpol Red Corner Notice, following which the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate sent formal extradition proposals to Oman. A specially deputed CBI team escorted him back to India. The CBI said he would be medically examined, taken to Raipur after obtaining a transit remand and produced before the CBI Special Judge in Raipur on November 2. He is wanted in two CBI cases in which chargesheets have been filed and an ED case in which a prosecution complaint has been filed. The CBI filed the chargesheets under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Indian Penal Code provisions relating to criminal conspiracy, cheating and forgery, and the Chhattisgarh Gambling (Prohibition) Act. Cases related to the alleged Mahadev app scam were handed to the CBI in 2024, while the ED has been probing money laundering aspects. The CBI described the extradition as a significant milestone in efforts to bring back fugitives operating transnational criminal enterprises.

Our Partners

gnlu nlud silf rvu gcai lti CubeRoots civis justiceadda manipal Lawctopus

Why Join Manupatra Academy

Brought to you by Manupatra the leaders in legal tech domain.

  • Curated Resources: A vast repository of meticulously compiled resources tailored for educators and learners.
  • Diverse Courses: An array of courses designed to cater to various levels of expertise, from beginners to advanced.
  • User-Friendly Interface: Accessible on any device, our intuitive interface ensures seamless navigation.

What Our Learners Say

User-Friendly Interface: Accessible on any device, our intuitive interface ensures seamless navigation.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

It was extremely beneficial and practical… really helped me understand the nuances of civil drafting and boosted my confidence in preparing real pleadings.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

The sessions were so insightful and well-structured… the faculty explained every concept with patience and clarity, which made learning much easier.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

Honestly, it was a great learning experience… the course covered everything from plaints to petitions in such a smooth and engaging way.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

The workshop was very hands-on and practical… I really liked the live feedback and the real examples shared during drafting exercises.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

Very well conducted and informative… I just wish it could’ve been a bit longer because the sessions were that helpful.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

The session was honestly eye-opening! I never realized how much time I was wasting on formatting until now.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

Really practical and focused on what lawyers actually need… I can already see how it’ll save hours in my daily work.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

The trainer made even the technical tools so easy to understand… and I loved how they used real pleading examples.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

Very relevant for lawyers and interns alike… it bridges the tech gap we all face while working on documents.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

A concise and super useful masterclass… I now feel confident managing citations, templates, and formatting with ease.

Certification Courses A Practical Guide to Legal Documents in PE & VC Transactions

Extremely helpful in breaking down complicated clauses into simple, understandable parts.

Certification Courses A Practical Guide to Legal Documents in PE & VC Transactions

The course made PE & VC documentation so much less intimidating… the examples were absolutely spot on.

Certification Courses A Practical Guide to Legal Documents in PE & VC Transactions

It was the perfect blend of law and business… I finally understood how term sheets and SHA clauses actually work in practice.

Certification Courses A Practical Guide to Legal Documents in PE & VC Transactions

The speaker explained complex transactional terms beautifully… it’s a must for anyone getting into corporate law.

Certification Courses A Practical Guide to Legal Documents in PE & VC Transactions

Engaging, clear, and full of practical insights… exactly what I needed to feel more confident while drafting investment documents.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Foundations of Commercial Litigation and Corporate Disputes

The coursework was extremely detailed and well-structured… the lectures and guest sessions were really insightful, and the quizzes made learning fun.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Foundations of Commercial Litigation and Corporate Disputes

The faculty explained even complex litigation concepts so clearly… and the real-life examples made everything easy to connect with.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Foundations of Commercial Litigation and Corporate Disputes

It was such an enriching course… the mix of theory and practical drafting exercises really helped strengthen my foundation in commercial disputes.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Foundations of Commercial Litigation and Corporate Disputes

Very informative and engaging throughout… the faculty and coordinator were so supportive and made sure every doubt was cleared.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Foundations of Commercial Litigation and Corporate Disputes

The course had a perfect balance between procedure and strategy… and honestly, I feel much more confident in handling commercial matters now.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Financial, Regulatory and Advanced Litigation Strategies

The speaker is honestly on another level… her way of simplifying complex litigation topics was just unmatched.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Financial, Regulatory and Advanced Litigation Strategies

The course was so detailed and well structured… I’ve genuinely learned a lot about financial and regulatory disputes.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Financial, Regulatory and Advanced Litigation Strategies

Extremely engaging! The real-world examples and case discussions made every class interesting and relatable.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Financial, Regulatory and Advanced Litigation Strategies

Very interactive and clear… all our doubts were patiently answered, and each session felt like solid progress.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Financial, Regulatory and Advanced Litigation Strategies

The best part was how it balanced theory and strategy… it truly enhanced my understanding of commercial litigation practice.